http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Docs/Jova ... runity.pdf
Found this which appears to be fairly new ... I can't say I understand what Marjanovic is saying here, but the Impact idea seems to marry up with what Bessler says about hammers & anvils and shadow boxers, etc, etc ...
Milkovic 14th June 2010 - new theory?
Moderator: scott
Milkovic 14th June 2010 - new theory?
Anything not related to elephants is irrelephant.
- path_finder
- Addict
- Posts: 2372
- Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:32 am
- Location: Paris (France)
re: Milkovic 14th June 2010 - new theory?
What I understood is simply coming from the '2ab' center term of the famous square formula: (a+b) ² = a ² + 2ab + b ² , wich must be taken in account and not only the sum of the both squares of the rotation parameters. The question is: where is located this '2ab' energy, and how to get it.
I cannot imagine why nobody though on this before, including myself? It is so simple!...
re: Milkovic 14th June 2010 - new theory?
I have built and played with one of his oscillators.
It is not hard to keep the pendulum running. I believe the device runs on CF (downforce) and inertia in the vertical plane(1 jump at each end). As soon as you allow the horizontal lever to move, the pendulum loses energy, and has to be given more of a push. That is why you see the device doing work where it doesn't have to move much, and the pendulum is on the short end of the lever, to extend the operating range of the work end.
It is not hard to keep the pendulum running. I believe the device runs on CF (downforce) and inertia in the vertical plane(1 jump at each end). As soon as you allow the horizontal lever to move, the pendulum loses energy, and has to be given more of a push. That is why you see the device doing work where it doesn't have to move much, and the pendulum is on the short end of the lever, to extend the operating range of the work end.
-
- Devotee
- Posts: 1975
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 12:13 pm
- Location: England
re: Milkovic 14th June 2010 - new theory?
Hi Greendoor,
at the same time Mr Veljko Milkovic was working on his two stage mechanical oscillator, I was working on my two stage mechanical oscillator system, the problem with Velijko's was how to get it to rotate a frame.
Mine was built on a rotary frame with a large number of weighted pendulums mounted in a counterbalance format, the pendulums would oscilllate in 180 degree cycles and there kinetic energy's chanelled back to fuel there rotaion which did not take a lot of rotating due to the counterbalance across the rotary frame, the surplus energy could then be taken off in the form of surplus rotary torque.
Those where the days of awakening.
Regards Trevor
at the same time Mr Veljko Milkovic was working on his two stage mechanical oscillator, I was working on my two stage mechanical oscillator system, the problem with Velijko's was how to get it to rotate a frame.
Mine was built on a rotary frame with a large number of weighted pendulums mounted in a counterbalance format, the pendulums would oscilllate in 180 degree cycles and there kinetic energy's chanelled back to fuel there rotaion which did not take a lot of rotating due to the counterbalance across the rotary frame, the surplus energy could then be taken off in the form of surplus rotary torque.
Those where the days of awakening.
Regards Trevor
I have been wrong before!
I have been right before!
Hindsight will tell us!
I have been right before!
Hindsight will tell us!
re: Milkovic 14th June 2010 - new theory?
Velkomilko forget to take medicine.
Pendulum don't work and thats it !
mgh=1/2mv^2 .
Pendulum don't work and thats it !
mgh=1/2mv^2 .