Milkovic 14th June 2010 - new theory?

A Bessler, gravity, free-energy free-for-all. Registered users can upload files, conduct polls, and more...

Moderator: scott

Post Reply
greendoor
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1286
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 6:18 am
Location: New Zealand

Milkovic 14th June 2010 - new theory?

Post by greendoor »

http://www.veljkomilkovic.com/Docs/Jova ... runity.pdf

Found this which appears to be fairly new ... I can't say I understand what Marjanovic is saying here, but the Impact idea seems to marry up with what Bessler says about hammers & anvils and shadow boxers, etc, etc ...
Anything not related to elephants is irrelephant.
User avatar
path_finder
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2372
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:32 am
Location: Paris (France)

re: Milkovic 14th June 2010 - new theory?

Post by path_finder »

What I understood is simply coming from the '2ab' center term of the famous square formula: (a+b) ² = a ² + 2ab + b ² , wich must be taken in account and not only the sum of the both squares of the rotation parameters. The question is: where is located this '2ab' energy, and how to get it.
I cannot imagine why nobody though on this before, including myself? It is so simple!...
User avatar
Tarsier79
Addict
Addict
Posts: 5214
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 2:17 am
Location: Qld, Australia

re: Milkovic 14th June 2010 - new theory?

Post by Tarsier79 »

I have built and played with one of his oscillators.

It is not hard to keep the pendulum running. I believe the device runs on CF (downforce) and inertia in the vertical plane(1 jump at each end). As soon as you allow the horizontal lever to move, the pendulum loses energy, and has to be given more of a push. That is why you see the device doing work where it doesn't have to move much, and the pendulum is on the short end of the lever, to extend the operating range of the work end.
Trevor Lyn Whatford
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1975
Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 12:13 pm
Location: England

re: Milkovic 14th June 2010 - new theory?

Post by Trevor Lyn Whatford »

Hi Greendoor,

at the same time Mr Veljko Milkovic was working on his two stage mechanical oscillator, I was working on my two stage mechanical oscillator system, the problem with Velijko's was how to get it to rotate a frame.

Mine was built on a rotary frame with a large number of weighted pendulums mounted in a counterbalance format, the pendulums would oscilllate in 180 degree cycles and there kinetic energy's chanelled back to fuel there rotaion which did not take a lot of rotating due to the counterbalance across the rotary frame, the surplus energy could then be taken off in the form of surplus rotary torque.

Those where the days of awakening.

Regards Trevor
I have been wrong before!
I have been right before!
Hindsight will tell us!
laikkis
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 46
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 6:04 pm

re: Milkovic 14th June 2010 - new theory?

Post by laikkis »

Velkomilko forget to take medicine.

Pendulum don't work and thats it !

mgh=1/2mv^2 .
User avatar
jim_mich
Addict
Addict
Posts: 7467
Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2003 12:02 am
Location: Michigan
Contact:

Post by jim_mich »

laikkis wrote:Pendulum don't work and thats it !
Such is not always true, for if the force on a pendulum were to be greater as it swings in one direction and lesser as it swings back in the opposite direction, then the swinging of the pendulum will accelerate.

Image
Post Reply