| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ken
Enthusiast

Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Posts: 199
Total Words: 14,519
Reputation: Banned
|
|
 |
|
Aman
Enthusiast

Joined: 08 Mar 2012
Posts: 235
Total Words: 19,931
Reputation: Disregarded by many
|
|
 |
|
DrWhat
Addict

Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2006
Total Words: 88,230
Location: Sydney
Reputation: Highly regarded
|
|
 |
|
Ken
|
|
 |
|
murilo
Addict


Joined: 07 Nov 2003
Posts: 2308
Total Words: 155,203
Location: sp - brazil
Reputation: Appreciated
|
|
 |
|
Aman
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2012 5:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DrWhat wrote: | Aman, It is like saying it is impossible for nothing to exist (ie infinite space in the universe). It is easier for there to be nothing than there to be something.
Think of it this way. If you take everything out of the universe, how big is the space that is left? Infinite because there is noting there. "Nothing there" is the size of the universe. Infinite. If you add a boundary you have added something.
The universe can be expanding, but the empty space is not be expanding (there is nothing to expand), just the mass or movement of the mass is expanding within a visible/measurable are. |
Thanks,DrWhat,good answer.
In my daily life,I am following law of conservation of energy.
But if there is some Important mystery like boundry of universe and its Quantisation,we should discuss about it so that we understand universe more deeply.This understanding will open up more secrets about energy.
On one side it's common sense that everything is quantised.
On other side,it's common sense that space does not seem to have boundry and hence not quantised.Even if space is quantised,what is outside the boundry of space?
These two things are absolutely contradictory to each other and should be studied in detail.The great Stephan hawking may have answer for this.
Hi Ken,
Good morning!
Whether energy in universe is quantised or not is strange question ?
And there should be a hidden answer for this.
But please do not comment that COP should be always greater than one neither in raj's thread nor in any other's thread.
All devices in this world including IC engines and rechargeable batteries are made with criteria that COP is always less than one and gravity engines are made by same criteria and such gravity device work because
95 percent working Gravity engines work on the principle that the gravitational energy input is made more than what energy needed to lift ball upward ,by innovative thinking .
With reference to my working condition engine concept as discussed in my thread,
Balance energy equation for my concept:
Energy supplied to lift Red ball through commutator controlled motor mode at pivot + gravitational energy required to push the resistance away + frictional losses + other entropy losses = supplied energy recovered though generator mode by commutator control at pivot(red coloured in sketch) + electricity converted from overcoming of resistance+ frictional losses + Back EMF losses + other entropy losses.
Tell me where is COP > 1 here in my engine concept?
|
|
 |
|
Ken
|
|
 |
|
Aman
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2012 7:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
What do you understood from this?
95 percent working Gravity engines work on the principle that the gravitational energy input is made more than what energy needed to lift ball upward ,by innovative thinking .
Please reply.
I have discovered two ways to do this.
I have described in my two threads.
I think there are few things which we both agree but there are few things which I don't agree with you,neither the society.
Others also can comment on this if they like to.
The most problematic thing with people is they do not think how more amount of gravity can be inputted to gravity powered engine ,than that needed to take ball up.
If you substract total Gravitational energy input from the energy needed to lift heavy balls up in a gravity wheel,you get some net gravitational energy which is the net energy input to the system(input after subtraction) which can be converted to electrical energy.This is the scientific basis for any real Gravity engine.And hence real Gravity engines are not perpetual and do not violate Laws of energy conservation.
And I am surprised to know that most people at bessler wheels forum who are trying to make Gravity wheel do not consider this.If you do not consider this,you will never be able to make a gravity wheel.
|
|
 |
|
|