Forum Index
BesslerWheel.com
Discussion Board

Log inLog in RegisterRegister SearchSearch BlogsBlogs Blog NewsBlog News PollsPolls FAQFAQ FAQWiki
Forum Index
Why does my reaction puzzle so many people?

 
Page 1 of 1
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Forum Index -> General Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ken
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Joined: 25 Jan 2010
Posts: 199
Total Words: 14,519


Reputation: Banned
Banned  
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 6:15 pm    Post subject: Why does my reaction puzzle so many people? Reply with quote Report Post to Admin

You get what you give me.

Too simple for many to grasp.

:)


Back to top
View user's profile
Aman
Enthusiast
Enthusiast

Joined: 08 Mar 2012
Posts: 235
Total Words: 19,931


Reputation: Disregarded by many
Disregarded by many  
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:20 pm    Post subject: re: Why does my reaction puzzle so many people? Reply with quote Report Post to Admin

Here is an another puzzle.I think,you may like it ken!

I have one great mystery question?How big is this universe.Universe has no boundary?
Even infinity is also not possible.Becasue if there is any such boundry of universe,what is there outside the peripheral boundry of universe.
Is this something related to violation of Quantum theory which says everything is Quantised?
Is this hence something like violation of law of conservation?

No,I am not at all directly telling that there is violation ,but this is just an interesting open Question.I want answer for this.



_________________
Science is the king,commerce and MBA are servants of mankind.True Gravity-magnetic powered engines are possible but they cannot be against 3 basic laws of thermodynamics and newton's laws of motion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send email Blog
DrWhat
Addict
Addict

Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2006
Total Words: 88,230
Location: Sydney

Reputation: Highly regarded
Highly regarded  
PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 10:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Post to Admin

Aman, It is like saying it is impossible for nothing to exist (ie infinite space in the universe). It is easier for there to be nothing than there to be something.

Think of it this way. If you take everything out of the universe, how big is the space that is left? Infinite because there is noting there. "Nothing there" is the size of the universe. Infinite. If you add a boundary you have added something.

The universe can be expanding, but the empty space is not be expanding (there is nothing to expand), just the mass or movement of the mass is expanding within a visible/measurable are.


Back to top
View user's profile Send email Visit poster's website
Ken






PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2012 11:55 pm    Post subject: re: Why does my reaction puzzle so many people? Reply with quote Report Post to Admin

Aman

Infinity is mathematically provable. It appears in the 7th dimension.

And you keep calling Newton guess a law, when we KNOW it is not a law.

Now with these 2 corrections. what is the mystery again?


Back to top
View user's profile
murilo
Addict
Addict

Joined: 07 Nov 2003
Posts: 2298
Total Words: 154,916
Location: sp - brazil

Reputation: Appreciated
Appreciated  
PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 1:47 am    Post subject: Re: re: Why does my reaction puzzle so many people? Reply with quote Report Post to Admin

Aman wrote:
Here is an another puzzle.I think,you may like it ken!

I have one great mystery question?How big is this universe.Universe has no boundary?
Even infinity is also not possible.Becasue if there is any such boundry of universe,what is there outside the peripheral boundry of universe.
Is this something related to violation of Quantum theory which says everything is Quantised?
Is this hence something like violation of law of conservation?

No,I am not at all directly telling that there is violation ,but this is just an interesting open Question.I want answer for this.


Aman,
I have the strong feeling that you have your deep guessing and abstractions... as normal to intelligent people...

...BUT, there are in your education and culture - MAYBE - hard principles you avoid to hurt and force/twist to be coherent, inside that so called box.

If I'm correct, this explains the not comfortable way you discuss stuffs... 8(

Best!
M


Back to top
View user's profile Send email
Aman






PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 5:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote Report Post to Admin

DrWhat wrote:
Aman, It is like saying it is impossible for nothing to exist (ie infinite space in the universe). It is easier for there to be nothing than there to be something.

Think of it this way. If you take everything out of the universe, how big is the space that is left? Infinite because there is noting there. "Nothing there" is the size of the universe. Infinite. If you add a boundary you have added something.

The universe can be expanding, but the empty space is not be expanding (there is nothing to expand), just the mass or movement of the mass is expanding within a visible/measurable are.


Thanks,DrWhat,good answer.
In my daily life,I am following law of conservation of energy.
But if there is some Important mystery like boundry of universe and its Quantisation,we should discuss about it so that we understand universe more deeply.This understanding will open up more secrets about energy.

On one side it's common sense that everything is quantised.
On other side,it's common sense that space does not seem to have boundry and hence not quantised.Even if space is quantised,what is outside the boundry of space?

These two things are absolutely contradictory to each other and should be studied in detail.The great Stephan hawking may have answer for this.

Hi Ken,
Good morning!

Whether energy in universe is quantised or not is strange question ?
And there should be a hidden answer for this.

But please do not comment that COP should be always greater than one neither in raj's thread nor in any other's thread.
All devices in this world including IC engines and rechargeable batteries are made with criteria that COP is always less than one and gravity engines are made by same criteria and such gravity device work because


95 percent working Gravity engines work on the principle that the gravitational energy input is made more than what energy needed to lift ball upward ,by innovative thinking .

With reference to my working condition engine concept as discussed in my thread,

Balance energy equation for my concept:

Energy supplied to lift Red ball through commutator controlled motor mode at pivot + gravitational energy required to push the resistance away + frictional losses + other entropy losses = supplied energy recovered though generator mode by commutator control at pivot(red coloured in sketch) + electricity converted from overcoming of resistance+ frictional losses + Back EMF losses + other entropy losses.

Tell me where is COP > 1 here in my engine concept?


Back to top
View user's profile Send email Blog
Ken






PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 6:56 am    Post subject: re: Why does my reaction puzzle so many people? Reply with quote Report Post to Admin

Aman,

You are too vague with your device for an evaluation.

If you never have a cop>1 then you will never have a working wheel. Or any other free energy device.

Only when the COP>1 do you have free energy.

Quote:
But please do not comment that COP should be always greater than one neither in raj's thread nor in any other's thread.


Aman, do not tell me what to post nor where. Got it? I have just removed you from the list of people who will view the live stream.

I do not know why people want to try and control me. I am not yours to control. Nor even talk about trying to control. GOT IT? I mean for real, who do you think you are telling me what and where to post?

From my perspective people can post whatever they like. I will then agree, refute, or ignore.

What is this obsession with people trying to tell me what to do? Get a life.

It seems that people with mental stability are a lot harder to find than it use to be.


Back to top
View user's profile
Aman






PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 7:05 am    Post subject: Report Post to Admin

What do you understood from this?
95 percent working Gravity engines work on the principle that the gravitational energy input is made more than what energy needed to lift ball upward ,by innovative thinking .

Please reply.

I have discovered two ways to do this.
I have described in my two threads.


I think there are few things which we both agree but there are few things which I don't agree with you,neither the society.
Others also can comment on this if they like to.

The most problematic thing with people is they do not think how more amount of gravity can be inputted to gravity powered engine ,than that needed to take ball up.

If you substract total Gravitational energy input from the energy needed to lift heavy balls up in a gravity wheel,you get some net gravitational energy which is the net energy input to the system(input after subtraction) which can be converted to electrical energy.This is the scientific basis for any real Gravity engine.And hence real Gravity engines are not perpetual and do not violate Laws of energy conservation.

And I am surprised to know that most people at bessler wheels forum who are trying to make Gravity wheel do not consider this.If you do not consider this,you will never be able to make a gravity wheel.


Back to top
View user's profile Send email Blog
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic  Reply to topic    Forum Index -> General Discussion All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1


 
Jump to:   
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

Log in:         Remember me     

Please click below to help support this website!

Google