| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
grim
Enthusiast

Joined: 27 Dec 2003
Posts: 108
Total Words: 5,934
Reputation: Appreciated
|
Posted: Fri Feb 20, 2004 2:06 am Post subject: re: One question |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Jonathan
Addict


Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 2458
Total Words: 229,845
Location: Tucson, Az
Reputation: Well respected
|
|
 |
|
jim_mich
Addict


Joined: 07 Dec 2003
Posts: 5306
Total Words: 687,936
Location: Michigan
Reputation: Highly regarded
|
|
 |
|
Jonathan

|
|
 |
|
John Lindsay
Enthusiast

Joined: 08 Nov 2003
Posts: 78
Total Words: 8,361
Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Reputation: Acknowledged
|
|
 |
|
Sevich
Aficionado

Joined: 06 Nov 2003
Posts: 278
Total Words: 27,021
Location: sydney Australia
Reputation: Respected
|
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 1:31 am Post subject: re: One question |
|
|
Jonathan wrote | Quote: | | I noticed 'they' didn't censor this paragraph, nor disable the link you provided, nor stopped you from finding that link, nor stopped that site from being created. | Evil that hides behind the curtain of Democracy works hard to make people believe they are free and in control. (Cheese on a mousetrap) Jim_Mich wrote | Quote: | | Jonathan, get real! Of course 'they' did't censor that paragraph, nor disable the link provided. | After a long drought, this good laugh is long overdue!! .....Animation included. :)
_________________ When things go wrong,
as they sometimes will,
When the road you're trudging seems all up hill...
When care is pressing you down a bit,
Rest, if you must - but don't you quit!
|
|
 |
|
Jonathan

|
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 2:35 am Post subject: re: One question |
|
|
I agree John, one must watch out for such things. I watch, and I see very very little.
You guys, if there was any conspiracy, they would by definition have to commit acts of conspiracy, such as suppression. As I've said, there are 259000 websites from Google alone on the topic of perpetual motion available to me at the cost of 3 clicks and 27 keystrokes, and many, many of them aren't skeptical. The allowance of this is indicative of a complete lack of suppression. The only suppression that I can see as feasible (as in being hard to detect) is patent suppression, and I know that this hasn't occured to any great extent because I have easy access to many FE patents.
|
|
 |
|
VergingOnDone
Enthusiast

Joined: 14 Dec 2003
Posts: 91
Total Words: 8,452
Location: Vancouver, BC
Reputation: None
|
|
 |
|
Jonathan

|
|
 |
|
jim_mich

|
|
 |
|
TommyK
Enthusiast


Joined: 21 Dec 2003
Posts: 107
Total Words: 17,960
Location: Retired/Vacation.
Reputation: None
|
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2004 8:47 pm Post subject: re: One question |
|
|
Hey Jim,
I was reading an article on hydrogen
http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2003/05/ma_375_01.html
and in this one paragraph is a line with an almost too funny Freudian slip.
Wouldn't invested in have been a better choice then locked up?
As hydrogen gained momentum, the oil companies rushed to buy up interests in technology companies developing ways to refine and store the new fuel. Texaco has invested $82 million in a firm called Energy Conversion Devices, and Shell now owns half of Hydrogen Source. BP, Chevron-Texaco, ExxonMobil, Ford, and General Electric have also locked up the services of many of America's top energy scientists, devoting more than $270 million to hydrogen research at MIT, Princeton, and Stanford
|
|
 |
|
Jonathan

|
|
 |
|
VergingOnDone
|
Posted: Sun Feb 22, 2004 5:09 am Post subject: Re: re: One question |
|
|
| Jonathan wrote: | | Once again, in the cases where it does appear to have occurred, it could have been easily avoided if the inventor just gave the information out freely instead of trying to make money directly off it. I say directly because even if you give out the information freely you can still get money through book deals or prizes. I've mentioned that the Nobel Prize comes with a million bucks. Twenty or so years after the device is spread around, the scientific community will finally be dragged kicking and screaming into recognition of the device, and it's quite likely you'll win around then. |
By then other people will have taken the credit you deserve, you'll be poor and grey and by coincedence you'll die weeks before due credit is served. Aren't I optimistic? Joe Neuman's (again with JN) device has been around longer than 30 years and who has heard of him? He needs a new publicist!!! So like I said, I think not all working devices recieve the recognition they deserve.
I however promise to show a covered wheel in action if and when my wheel is finished / working. I do have confidence in it working because the interaction of transferring the power to the necessary part works like bessler describes, and it will be able to rotate in both directions, I'm trying to find off the shelf parts for most of it, it's more than half built though and some of the seer, or sensor spring parts are hard to come by or think of what to use off the shelf.
And I have made a swf animation showing the parts interacting, but I'm not ready to share that yet. All I can say I wish I had access to a machine shop and steel tubing, and welding stuff. It would make it so fast to build. Dumb wood and bike parts don't do justice, but it's just to see if it definitely works as thought.
|
|
 |
|
Joel Wright
Enthusiast


Joined: 19 Dec 2003
Posts: 220
Total Words: 21,568
Location: U.S.A.
Reputation: Acknowledged
|
|
 |
|
jim_mich

|
|
 |
|
|