| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| If you see a posted error, what would you do? I would... |
| slam the post & the poster |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| politely correct the poster & possibly post example |
|
66% |
[ 4 ] |
| post a corrected example without reference to original |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| just let it ride |
|
33% |
[ 2 ] |
|
| Total Votes : : 6 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Gwheel
Enthusiast

Joined: 13 Apr 2009
Posts: 27
Total Words: 4,911
Location: New England
Reputation: None
|
Posted: Thu Apr 14, 2011 4:43 pm Post subject: What do you do? I feel the pain (actually based on science) |
|
|
Your flaws are my pain
April 13, 2011
Today, there is increasing exposure of individuals to a public audience. Television shows and the internet provide platforms for this and, at times, allow observing others' flaws and norm transgressions. Regardless of whether the person observed realizes their flaw or not, observers in the audience experience vicarious embarrassment.
source: http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-04-flaws-pain.html
On BesslerWheel.com, an obvious example would be a post containing faulty critical thinking, which is occasionally manifested in the posting of an invalid physics example. I feel the pain. What to do? How do I resolve this within my own ethics framework? I would like to help if I can and I obviously want to see a high level of accuracy in respect to physics examples. After all, we are not physicists, we are still learning. Maybe, to point out a poster's error publicly, will embarrass, will discourage, and will actually reduce posting. That would not be good. Another consideration, I suspect, is the Reputation system. If I post, pointing out a poster's error, will that affect my reputation? Have I been too anal, too critical, or am I just an asshole? If I am a new member on the forum and don't have a high level of physics knowledge, and point out an error made by a respected member, am I more likely to get my red dot (is this a redie? ...lol) punched? I feel the pain.
If you see an error, do you post a correction or do you just let it ride? What would you do?
_________________ Currently enrolled at Autodidacticism U.
|
|
 |
|
Fletcher
Addict


Joined: 05 Nov 2003
Posts: 3994
Total Words: 660,108
Location: fiji
Reputation: Highly regarded
|
|
 |
|
rlortie
Addict


Joined: 06 Jan 2005
Posts: 6780
Total Words: 927,232
Location: Stanfield Or.
Reputation: Highly regarded
|
|
 |
|
nicbordeaux
Devotee

Joined: 30 Sep 2009
Posts: 1929
Total Words: 211,152
Reputation: Well respected
|
|
 |
|
to.late
Enthusiast

Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 79
Total Words: 9,357
Reputation: Banned
|
Posted: Mon Apr 18, 2011 10:43 pm Post subject: Re: What do you do? I feel the pain (actually based on scien |
|
|
GWheel,
A response can vary. I have found solid scientific basis is quite often ignored. It seems what a person is comfortable with is what they are familiar with.
And ego's are very prominent. I could cite my own disregarded by many for not forsaking engineering or science for the benefit of my own popularity. But it is an example of the difference between what people say and do.
Bessler I doubt got lucky and built something that worked because of sudden inspiration as some wish it to be believed despite his writings to the contrary.
Want a dose of reality ? Check out Grimers thread. They want him to build even though he is well respected. What happened to all the builders who can get'er done ? They've all but disappeared behind words.
And this is the reality. It is easy to post anything, it is quite different to be a man of your words.
And yet with Grimer, he has made no claims as to what he can do as a builder. At least there is one man in this forum.
|
|
 |
|
|