Ralph,
If you are interested in building Bessler's wheel, I can give you the secrets.
It's not worth all the bullshit.
If so, pm me with an e-mail address I can send pics to.
2 rlortie
Moderator: scott
re: 2 rlortie
James.Lindgaard
My address is open to all and you should already have it if you read your mail. I have already PM'd you with it.
My e-mail address is the same as for 'Arrache' and is public knowledge, it is;
rlortie@Q.com
I do not mind advertizing, it is immune to spammer robots.
If you wish to send me what you think is the secret to Bessler's wheel please feel free to do so. I will be more than willing to examine it as I do any and all submissions.
Ralph
My address is open to all and you should already have it if you read your mail. I have already PM'd you with it.
My e-mail address is the same as for 'Arrache' and is public knowledge, it is;
rlortie@Q.com
I do not mind advertizing, it is immune to spammer robots.
If you wish to send me what you think is the secret to Bessler's wheel please feel free to do so. I will be more than willing to examine it as I do any and all submissions.
Ralph
-
Unbalanced
- Aficionado
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 6:53 pm
- Location: Bend, OR
re: 2 rlortie
If you would like a second opinion James I would be happy to help you evaluate your ideas, seasick at hotmail.com
-
James.Lindgaard
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:56 pm
re: 2 rlortie
rlortie & unbalanced,
An e-mail has been sent.
FYI will need more surgery, miss more work etc.
Difficult to try to do both.
May be possible for me to me make a video to demonstrate
some of the things I mentioned. Hopefully you will understand.
There are some details that are ihat I did not include.
Wish to avoid information over load. Has to do with stress loads, etc.
Helps to define construction, helps to keep it simple.
Of course, math helps and you may find out why.
And if so, you might say "coooolllll".
edited to add; rlortie and unbalanced, contact each other if there is somethng you do not understand. If still unclear, then contact me.
I hope to keep this private (in as few hands as possible) until awheel is built. And unbalanced, if you like it and have the means, it is up to you.
And last, could you 2 say yes or no to if you like my work ?
Thanx
An e-mail has been sent.
FYI will need more surgery, miss more work etc.
Difficult to try to do both.
May be possible for me to me make a video to demonstrate
some of the things I mentioned. Hopefully you will understand.
There are some details that are ihat I did not include.
Wish to avoid information over load. Has to do with stress loads, etc.
Helps to define construction, helps to keep it simple.
Of course, math helps and you may find out why.
And if so, you might say "coooolllll".
edited to add; rlortie and unbalanced, contact each other if there is somethng you do not understand. If still unclear, then contact me.
I hope to keep this private (in as few hands as possible) until awheel is built. And unbalanced, if you like it and have the means, it is up to you.
And last, could you 2 say yes or no to if you like my work ?
Thanx
-
James.Lindgaard
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:56 pm
I have sent a second e-mail to rlortie and unbalanced concerning the 4"1 ratio Bessler mentioned.
With this, I have shown where Besler having said he used tubes or pipes would matter.
The clue about tubes and pipes I have not heard referenced in an English speaking forum.
It was translated for and told to me by a German. A friend of Helmut's :-)
With this, I have shown where Besler having said he used tubes or pipes would matter.
The clue about tubes and pipes I have not heard referenced in an English speaking forum.
It was translated for and told to me by a German. A friend of Helmut's :-)
re: 2 rlortie
James.Lindgaard
Your first two posts have arrived and reviewed.
I fail to see where math is a problem and obviously I do not see why it should.
I will not be saying coooollll until after the fat lady sings and as of now she is not on stage. I await your detailed drawings with explaining text. If you want a fair analysis you have to show us what you got and how you expect it to be built.
Sorry but three pictures out of six on a commercial photo slide show web site is not the information we require.
Ralph
Your first two posts have arrived and reviewed.
Do not fear 'information overload' I am confident that Curtis and I can handle it. You are not helping to define construction and what you have sent is to simple to be of any value.There are some details that are ihat I did not include.
Wish to avoid information over load. Has to do with stress loads, etc.
Helps to define construction, helps to keep it simple.
Of course, math helps and you may find out why.
And if so, you might say "coooolllll".
I fail to see where math is a problem and obviously I do not see why it should.
I will not be saying coooollll until after the fat lady sings and as of now she is not on stage. I await your detailed drawings with explaining text. If you want a fair analysis you have to show us what you got and how you expect it to be built.
Sorry but three pictures out of six on a commercial photo slide show web site is not the information we require.
Ralph
-
James.Lindgaard
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:56 pm
Ralph,
I will consider this.
Your friend Ken considerd me capable. He had better qualifications than you.
It could be why me and him are friends. He has worked for what he has and can respect other peoples accomplishments.
One day, you might beas good as your build partner.
It was a shame he had to create a false id to support my work when you and Alan did not.
But then, he is better aquainted with this type of effort.
I will consider this.
Your friend Ken considerd me capable. He had better qualifications than you.
It could be why me and him are friends. He has worked for what he has and can respect other peoples accomplishments.
One day, you might beas good as your build partner.
It was a shame he had to create a false id to support my work when you and Alan did not.
But then, he is better aquainted with this type of effort.
re: 2 rlortie
An argue bot with context parameters set to zero :D
-
James.Lindgaard
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:56 pm
Re: re: 2 rlortie
unbalanced,Unbalanced wrote:If you would like a second opinion James I would be happy to help you evaluate your ideas, seasick at hotmail.com
Do now that Ralph and Alan have their own interets to promote.
It does not matter what they do.
As for what I have worked on, their thoughtss do not matter. They want for free what they can not have. And in this, Scott will support them. He is their friend and that is what friends do.
As for Bessler, Ralph can not stop him from becoming known. He wishes to be a bishop while he is but a pawn.
-
James.Lindgaard
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:56 pm
Re: re: 2 rlortie
Ralph,
Don't forget that unbalanced is reviewing the same information you recieved.
As such, if he finds my work worth considering, then it can be considered that you are looking for your own opportunity to profit off of my work on Bessler., Affter all, your judgement was to quick to actually be considered a valid opinion unless you saw something worth while in it.
Because unbalanced wished to review it, I allowed you to see my work.
Because you are Alan's private build partner, your views can be considerd biased in the hopes of discrediting me or profiting off of my work.
edited to add, by discrediting Bessler, you can claim his work as your own.
This is why I work openly when I can.
You ignore my own education and experience. Most people would consider this fool hardy. Maybe before you say how a pendulum clock works, you will learn how they work ? I should not have to correct you.
Don't forget that unbalanced is reviewing the same information you recieved.
As such, if he finds my work worth considering, then it can be considered that you are looking for your own opportunity to profit off of my work on Bessler., Affter all, your judgement was to quick to actually be considered a valid opinion unless you saw something worth while in it.
Because unbalanced wished to review it, I allowed you to see my work.
Because you are Alan's private build partner, your views can be considerd biased in the hopes of discrediting me or profiting off of my work.
edited to add, by discrediting Bessler, you can claim his work as your own.
This is why I work openly when I can.
You ignore my own education and experience. Most people would consider this fool hardy. Maybe before you say how a pendulum clock works, you will learn how they work ? I should not have to correct you.
-
James.Lindgaard
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:56 pm
Alan,AB Hammer wrote:Ralph
Please leave me out of anything James.Lindgaard sends. I don't even want indirect contact without witnesses. He is always trying to claim crap. This is a sick game to him.
Alan
Did you tell me that your own 7 year old nephew died from cancer ? And that because of this, there is no reason for you to be nice to anyone who has cancer ?
I do believe this is what you told me while I was recieving treatment.
-
James.Lindgaard
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:56 pm
Re: re: 2 rlortie
And yet you can patent what people think you dismissed. I am aware of this.rlortie wrote:James.Lindgaard
Your first two posts have arrived and reviewed.
Do not fear 'information overload' I am confident that Curtis and I can handle it. You are not helping to define construction and what you have sent is to simple to be of any value.There are some details that are ihat I did not include.
Wish to avoid information over load. Has to do with stress loads, etc.
Helps to define construction, helps to keep it simple.
Of course, math helps and you may find out why.
And if so, you might say "coooolllll".
I fail to see where math is a problem and obviously I do not see why it should.
I will not be saying coooollll until after the fat lady sings and as of now she is not on stage. I await your detailed drawings with explaining text. If you want a fair analysis you have to show us what you got and how you expect it to be built.
Sorry but three pictures out of six on a commercial photo slide show web site is not the information we require.
Ralph
Basically what you are saying is build it myself because you do not understand it.
You should just say as much. It is confusing when you become long winded and have trouble making a succint statement.
-
James.Lindgaard
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:56 pm
Re: 2 rlortie
For those who think I should be banned show your work.
Otherwise we are playing a child's game and not much more.
Otherwise we are playing a child's game and not much more.
-
James.Lindgaard
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:56 pm
Alan,AB Hammer wrote:Ralph
Please leave me out of anything James.Lindgaard sends. I don't even want indirect contact without witnesses. He is always trying to claim crap. This is a sick game to him.
Alan
This is how you killed overunity,com. You stalked me for no reason.
In this thread you were never mentioned yet here you are high lighting yourserlf.
Can anybody in this forum show where I mentioned Alan before he posted ?
If not, then he is the one who should be banned.