hectors wheel idea
Moderator: scott
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 am
- Location: australia
hectors wheel idea
ow boy here we go again..
OK Gravity Wheels are oriented to rotate top East bottom west ..
The simplest working design is swiveling arms that are stop at 90Deg
and retract at 90deg
as they go up they are retracted as they go DOWN a MAGNET asist in
EXTENDING them toward the outside and hit a PEG that mantains them at 90DEg in extended position this causes the weight of the Wheel to increase at that side .. making it rotate ..
OK speed is 33 RPM so you NEED a big WhEEL as Energy obtained is
less than a good windmill I am against its use because it SLOWS earth rotation ,,, as any device using Coreolis or gravity pendulum does , Remember OU & free energy comes from "transformation" gravity Wheels are just kinetomatic transformers ...
Its more A Neutonian Masturbation , he did not understood coreolis
force and centrifugal verctor redirection ! LOL
Hector :)
OK Gravity Wheels are oriented to rotate top East bottom west ..
The simplest working design is swiveling arms that are stop at 90Deg
and retract at 90deg
as they go up they are retracted as they go DOWN a MAGNET asist in
EXTENDING them toward the outside and hit a PEG that mantains them at 90DEg in extended position this causes the weight of the Wheel to increase at that side .. making it rotate ..
OK speed is 33 RPM so you NEED a big WhEEL as Energy obtained is
less than a good windmill I am against its use because it SLOWS earth rotation ,,, as any device using Coreolis or gravity pendulum does , Remember OU & free energy comes from "transformation" gravity Wheels are just kinetomatic transformers ...
Its more A Neutonian Masturbation , he did not understood coreolis
force and centrifugal verctor redirection ! LOL
Hector :)
re: hectors wheel idea
That Hector really is nuts, to extract energy from the earth's rotation would require it to rotate the other way, and in that case you wouldn't need arms, just a huge heavy wheel (and it would rotate only once a day, not every 2 secs). As coylo noted, that last part didn't make any sense either (what I did understand of it was wrong, see NeWton's first law).
Disclaimer: I reserve the right not to know what I'm talking about and not to mention this possibility in my posts. This disclaimer also applies to sentences I claim are quotes from anybody, including me.
Re: re: hectors wheel idea
Yes, but it doesn't have to make a revolution to extract energy. You can extract energy each time you turn it 180 so that apparent direction of rotation changes. The amount of rotation required would be less than a degree on a large wheel, say a 40 ft diameter one.Jonathan wrote: just a huge heavy wheel (and it would rotate only once a day, not every 2 secs).
Not knowing is not the problem. It is the knowing of what just isn't so.
It is our responsibilities, not ourselves,that we should take seriously.
It is our responsibilities, not ourselves,that we should take seriously.
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 am
- Location: australia
re: hectors wheel idea
can some one make a drawing of the design he proposes please.
how the hell can he have
how the hell can he have
as they go up they are retracted as they go DOWN a MAGNET asist in
EXTENDING them toward the outside and hit a PEG that mantains them at 90DEg in extended position this causes the weight of the Wheel to increase at that side .. making it rotate ..
re: hectors wheel idea
As I understood it, it sounds like an Arabian wheel with magnetic assist (doesn't work).
EDIT PS the marks indicate the north sides of the magnets. There are of course versions that have magnets outside, and have the weights just be iron (but they don't lift at the bottom as this does).
EDIT PS the marks indicate the north sides of the magnets. There are of course versions that have magnets outside, and have the weights just be iron (but they don't lift at the bottom as this does).
Disclaimer: I reserve the right not to know what I'm talking about and not to mention this possibility in my posts. This disclaimer also applies to sentences I claim are quotes from anybody, including me.
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 am
- Location: australia
re: hectors wheel idea
well i have sent hector a message to see if we got it right, how does this look to every one else?
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 am
- Location: australia
Re: re: hectors wheel idea
ha! they are hectors words man not mine, lol, have you seen the post by me, quantum pendulum from a nut case? thats him toocoylo wrote:You never cease to amaze me Epi.Its more A Neutonian Masturbation
hector is one manical 'human'
re: hectors wheel idea
The pegs are missing (though implied), but otherwise I think that is what he meant.
Disclaimer: I reserve the right not to know what I'm talking about and not to mention this possibility in my posts. This disclaimer also applies to sentences I claim are quotes from anybody, including me.
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 am
- Location: australia
re: hectors wheel idea
time for a re draw i think this is the response i got from hector...
Exact but ARMS must be SHORTER near 1/8 of shown and 10 times more in number, point of WEIGHT rest must be at same center than 90 deg angle hinge ... (center of mass)
If done right it will work but I DONT promote this as it STEALS power
from EARTH rotation..
Hector
Exact but ARMS must be SHORTER near 1/8 of shown and 10 times more in number, point of WEIGHT rest must be at same center than 90 deg angle hinge ... (center of mass)
If done right it will work but I DONT promote this as it STEALS power
from EARTH rotation..
Hector
re: hectors wheel idea
Eighty arms is ridiculus! And these parts doesn't make any sense:
"point of WEIGHT rest must be at same center than 90 deg angle hinge ... (center of mass)", "If done right it will work but I DONT promote this as it STEALS power from EARTH rotation.."
I think he means that the weight should exert itself at the hinge at all times, but given the way that the arms extend and retract, that isn't possible. And I don't see any connection between the movement of the arms and the possible ways to power it by the earth's movement.
EDIT
The geometry he describes doesn't allow any arm to retract individually, it will end up pushing one of the other arms inward with it.
"point of WEIGHT rest must be at same center than 90 deg angle hinge ... (center of mass)", "If done right it will work but I DONT promote this as it STEALS power from EARTH rotation.."
I think he means that the weight should exert itself at the hinge at all times, but given the way that the arms extend and retract, that isn't possible. And I don't see any connection between the movement of the arms and the possible ways to power it by the earth's movement.
EDIT
The geometry he describes doesn't allow any arm to retract individually, it will end up pushing one of the other arms inward with it.
Disclaimer: I reserve the right not to know what I'm talking about and not to mention this possibility in my posts. This disclaimer also applies to sentences I claim are quotes from anybody, including me.
-
- Aficionado
- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 6:11 am
- Location: australia
re: hectors wheel idea
dam so what about having short lengths and longer ones? your sure its 90!! i can picture what he is describing, but thats not the first time, hector is cryptic, he is like a dislexic cane toad that speaks in code..like another member on this board some where..
re: hectors wheel idea
I can't tell what you mean. You said 90, are you refering to the 80 arms? There are 8 arms in my drawing, and he said ten times as many. The length and the number of the arms doesn't matter, this device will never work and Hector is clearly nuts (this is accurate: "he is like a dislexic cane toad that speaks in code").
Disclaimer: I reserve the right not to know what I'm talking about and not to mention this possibility in my posts. This disclaimer also applies to sentences I claim are quotes from anybody, including me.