Leo Ackermann's test...

A Bessler, gravity, free-energy free-for-all. Registered users can upload files, conduct polls, and more...

Moderator: scott

Post Reply
iacob alex
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 am
Location: costa mesa /CA/US
Contact:

Leo Ackermann's test...

Post by iacob alex »

Simplicity is the first step to knowledge.
spinner361
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1136
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:34 am
Location: Wisconsin, U.S.A.

Post by spinner361 »

What a disappointment that he can't just leave it alone and let it go. I don't believe it. Not one single full rotation. Anyone can do that by making one section of the wheel heavier.
iacob alex
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 am
Location: costa mesa /CA/US
Contact:

re: Leo Ackermann's test...

Post by iacob alex »

.....can be simplified , if we experience TWO OPPOSITE ARMS...only!!!...the composite leverage of the "classic" wheel becoming a common lever(age) !!!
No fall ( motion under the influence of gravity ) ...no power.
.....or, more fall means more power !
Maybe, we " miss" the kinetic "ignition" of a a possible gravity. continuous unbalanced motion!?
Al_ex
Simplicity is the first step to knowledge.
Georg Künstler
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1718
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 12:22 pm
Location: Speyer, Germany
Contact:

re: Leo Ackermann's test...

Post by Georg Künstler »

Hi iacob alex,
you wrote:
Maybe, we " miss" the kinetic "ignition" of a a possible gravity. continuous unbalanced motion!?


I like this wording ignition, that exactly is happen in the Bi-directional wheel.

In the wheel the internal structure is constructed in that way, that it cannot recover from its ignition fall.
Best regards

Georg
iacob alex
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 am
Location: costa mesa /CA/US
Contact:

re: Leo Ackermann's test...

Post by iacob alex »

.....at : https://youtu.be/Rgp6gcSaF2Y
can be a simplified "wheel" , with a single variable arm , as :
www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text028.JPG
So , let it be manifest a continuous gravity down fall ( "flow"...) between
two gravitational levels .
In the lowest position , we have a "self" shortage of the long arm into a short arm due to the gravity "free hanging" ...as Leo Ackermann acts...and we have an unrestricted 360* continuous accelerated motion (rotation ) , due to a torque difference on the same side of the lever's fulcrum.
We have a "datum" achievement , so to think about a "sole" problem : to remake the top point starting unbalance ( short arm into a long arm ...maybe as Leo...) and , let's hope the "self motion" as a reality?!
For Georg :
-"ignition" is the gravity torque unbalance in the top position
-"explosion" is in fact a gravity torque "expansion"(360* accelerated rotation ) of the unbalance...
Al_ex
Simplicity is the first step to knowledge.
Georg Künstler
Devotee
Devotee
Posts: 1718
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2003 12:22 pm
Location: Speyer, Germany
Contact:

re: Leo Ackermann's test...

Post by Georg Künstler »

Hi Al_ex,
as I have said, I have experimented a lot with such constructions.
But I have detected that this is not the correct way. No way.

You must have a construction which will repeat at least every 45 degrees.
Proved with math.

In Addition you need to do that action by gravity himself. like a Redirect of Forces.

You wrote :
The ignition" is the gravity torque unbalance in the top Position"
exact what is necessary to break the symmetry.
Best regards

Georg
iacob alex
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2413
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 1:37 am
Location: costa mesa /CA/US
Contact:

re: Leo Ackermann's test...

Post by iacob alex »

.....can be simplified to the basics (the wheel , simply...as a lever), so to make more intelligible (and AVAILABLE ! especially...) the gravity unbalance...we can illustrate as something "alike" (two arms ,only ...and the size):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7AN2IR8p9w
Al_ex
Simplicity is the first step to knowledge.
Post Reply