Poll related to: "Big Troubles Brewing For The Theoretical Physics Smart-set"

[JUBAT]

I'll tone things down a bit. I think I've made my stance widely known, and until there is a runner...I'm right.

Feels good sitting in my throne of rightness.

Carry on ye minions!

I'll try to share more skepticly productive ideas...like my figure 8 weight idea I'm gonna test tonite.

[WaltzCee]

.
.
Did a little AI probing.

Me: How through out history can some people be so religious and with unreligious actions.

Dear Me,

Could you kindly define 'religious'?

Sincerely,
Reality

[daxwc]

Still want to talk about religion???

When I say that “I believe in religion”, what I mean is that I believe in the sense of community where everyone strives to be their best socially, similar to the principles upheld in many religions."

Are you being the best Christian you can be?

[WaltzCee]

Still want to talk about religion???

When I say that “I believe in religion”, what I mean is that I believe in the sense of community where everyone strives to be their best socially, similar to the principles upheld in many religions."

Are you being the best Christian you can be?

Sir, you brought up the subject. Ah, now I see your point. You want folk to adhere to your religion.

Having made the point about your religion, you state:

• Still want to talk about religion???

and framed it as a question. You're laughable.

[ovyyus]

Is there a geek in the house who would like to stop changing the subject or mischaracterizing the points?

Attempts at gaslighting probably isn't the best strategy on a forum where everyone can look back and see what was actually said, and in the context it was said. You can only edit your history here for a few minutes, then you live with it. Let the chips fall where they may.

[WaltzCee]

.
.
.
Not being one to jump to conclusions, I reserve the right to take this gentle readers points under advisement and revisit them at will, in perpetuity.

I think there are enough religions on Earth and am not to welcoming to the invention of a new one. Besides, the man of perdition is in charge of that department.
.

Did a little AI probing.

Me: How through out history can some people be so religious and with unreligious actions.
ChatGPT: Throughout history, there have been instances where individuals who profess religious beliefs have engaged in actions that appear contrary to the principles and teachings of their respective religions. This phenomenon can be attributed to a variety of factors, including the complexity of human nature, the influence of cultural and societal factors, and the potential for individuals to interpret religious teachings in different ways.

1. Human Nature and Fallibility: Humans are complex beings with a wide range of motivations, desires, and flaws. While someone may claim to be religious, they are not immune to the temptations, biases, and shortcomings that all people possess. Even deeply religious individuals may struggle with their own personal weaknesses and fail to live up to the moral standards set by their faith.

2. Interpretation and Selective Adherence: Religions often have sacred texts or teachings that can be open to interpretation. Different individuals or groups may interpret religious doctrines differently, leading to variations in beliefs and practices. This can result in some individuals emphasizing certain aspects of their religion while neglecting or downplaying others. They may selectively adhere to the parts of their faith that align with their own interests or desires while disregarding those that conflict with their behavior.

3. Cultural and Societal Influences: The cultural and societal contexts in which individuals live can shape their behaviors and actions, sometimes superseding the religious principles they claim to follow. Societal norms, political factors, and historical events can exert significant influence on individuals' actions, even if those actions appear to contradict their religious beliefs. In some cases, people may use religion as a tool to justify or legitimize their actions, even if those actions are not inherently religious in nature.

4. Hypocrisy and Manipulation: Unfortunately, there have been instances throughout history where individuals in positions of religious authority have been hypocritical or manipulative. Some religious leaders or institutions have exploited their positions for personal gain or power, using religion as a means to control or manipulate others. Such individuals may engage in unreligious actions while professing devoutness to their followers.

It is important to note that the actions of a few individuals do not necessarily represent the beliefs or practices of an entire religious group. The majority of religious individuals strive to live according to the principles of their faith and make positive contributions to society. However, it is the presence of these inconsistent individuals that can lead to the perception that some people are religious in name only or exhibit unreligious actions despite their professed beliefs.

[daxwc]

Walt: You're laughable.

Maybe; banter in jest is one thing but there is a limit; people other than yourself have rights too.

Walt: You want folk to adhere to your religion.

From my understanding we are of the same religion unless you started your own side sect of Christianity.

You seem to be avoiding the question. “Are you being the best Christian you can be?”

PS: And if you are not a Christian are you being the best person you can be of the one you are of?


.

[ovyyus]

Daxwc, GPT missed a category:

5. Mental Defect.

[eccentrically1]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution ... d_religion

I have an idea for a new religion.
The church of perpetual motion :7)

[WaltzCee]

.
.

You seem to be avoiding the question. “Are you being[ the best Christian you can be?”

.
We'll get to this.

All religions are man made.

I'm curious what Puritan standard you're wondering I'm lacking in.

You come across as a wiccan Christian.

[daxwc]

Why does every discussion forum seem to have someone that fills the hole of online bully or someone who engages in antagonistic behaviour in online forums?

This was a serious question that ChatGPT didn’t answer, because I myself sometimes fill this role if it is open in the online community.

I'm curious what Puritan standard you're wondering I'm lacking in.

4. Hypocrisy and Manipulation: Unfortunately, there have been instances throughout history where individuals in positions of religious authority have been hypocritical or manipulative. Some religious leaders or institutions have exploited their positions for personal gain or power, using religion as a means to control or manipulate others. Such individuals may engage in unreligious actions while professing devoutness to their followers.



.

[WaltzCee]

.
.
.
in the market place pretending to be one of free & open debate, this

• This was a serious question that ChatGPT didn’t answer, because I myself sometimes fill this role if it is open in online community.

seems to be a case of deceptive advertising. Learn what it means when my client magnifies his word above his name.

Stop humiliating yourself.

::: sharpens pencil :::

[daxwc]

Walt: Learn what it means when my client magnifies his word above his name.

"I understand the importance of magnifying one's word above their name. However, I believe true faith should also be reflected in actions. It's not enough to simply speak the words; living by the principles we preach is what truly matters."

[Fletcher]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution ... d_religion

I have an idea for a new religion.
The church of perpetual motion :7)

;7) it'll never take off ..

[WaltzCee]

.
.
.
I've once mentioned my favorite Greek thinker is Euclid. I think I'll steal some prior art from the dead religious cult, puh•thag•or•ist.

DISCLAIMER: I STILL LOVE YOU EUCLID. WE CAN STILL BE FRIENDS.