Re: Unexplored Tensional applications/BTU;)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]

Posted by John Lindsay (207.150.66.32) on March 22, 2003 at 11:26:08:

In Reply to: Re: Unexplored Tensional applications/BUT posted by David on March 21, 2003 at 13:17:50:

: But John, 2+2does =4. No matter what. And physics and math are virtually the same thing. The only thing that confounds mathematicians is when they start believing math has a reality outside of the principles of physics. When they no longer appply the principles of physics to their math. Some have even gone insane doing this. Well, how does the saying go-There is more to the Universe than was ever conceived in any Philosophy or Science-. Johanns' weights haven't mysteriously doubled up on there energy signature in time/space or anything like that. So I don't view it as a But situation. It is an unrecognized concept to linear thought-form science. Mainstream science just assumed that there was no way to "redirect" or "redistribute" the forces that are there without introducing more energy or creating something out of thin air. Since they hadn't come up with anything that exhibited a Non-Equilibrium-Tensional-System-Interface or "Force Favoritism" they just assumed that nothing like that could exist. John


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Comments:
(Archived Message)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]