Re: Clarification request for John Collins


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]

Posted by John Collins (194.164.148.207) on October 27, 2002 at 12:26:17:

In Reply to: Re: Clarification request for John Collins posted by Pete on October 27, 2002 at 10:21:16:

: : A small correction to my previous posting. The first translation was not, as I stated previously, by Gould, but was used by him and was taken from the original translation by Henry Dircks in 1870. The interesting thing, which I failed to notice before now, is that whereas Gould uses the words "...one or other of them must apply its weight at right angles to the axis, which in turn must also move." Dircks version runs, "one or other of them must apply its weight vertically to the axis, which in turn will also move."

: : So you have a choice of right angles, or vertically!

: : Regards

: : John

: John,

: Re the above, right angles and vertically to the axis, are they not the same thing, the 3:00 position?

: Pete.

: Yes Pete that may be so, but why did Gould change it? If a weight applies its self at right angles to the axis it seems to me to mean that it is out to the side of the axis, whereas vertically sounds as if it is under it, which doesn't seem to make sense.

John





Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Comments:
(Archived Message)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]