Posted by Øystein Rustad (217.70.229.39) on December 05, 2002 at 17:35:01:
In Reply to: Thoughts+experiments on gravity posted by Davis Landstrom on December 05, 2002 at 15:36:51:
Thoughts .......
The "trouble" and (solution) with thinking of gravity as Ether wind is this :...........?
A constant/static Ether flow is causing neither gravity nor inertia. Like travelling at a constant high speed in empty space (Ether)don`t need acceleration (F).
So to create gravity/inertia you will need either an accelerating body or an accelerating Ether flow.
Thus gravity and inertia is one. (but opposite)
As the electron vortex moves, it creates a magnetic field (rotating Ether) to "fuel" the atom, the Ether flows in to the atom and creates accelerating Etherflow (unbalanced)gravity /inertia.
The Ether flow into the atom electron vortices will increase with the square of the distance as one aproaches the atom.
So we will have an acceleration of Etherflow towards any atom, thus creating gravity/inertia.
This actually has to do with Einsteins time dillation equations.
That is one of his safest formulas, and is compatible with the Ether gravity. Gravity is inverse inertia and the other way around. Change in time dillation is pure energy exchange mass/Ether.And time dillation is the energy level / momentum of the electronvortex.
Then we can see that time dillation is equal to mass(electron vortices) relative to ether, thus gravityfields also causes time dillation !
This again has to do with energy exchange between orbiting electrones (vortex) and the Ether.
Simply explained : When the electron vortex has stabalized its roation (momentum) to the relative Ether-speed, gravity/inertia/momentum is ZERO...
(Think of the atom as a one armed wheel rotating at high speed)
creating inertia / momentum because of the unbalanced centrifugal forces as one accelerate or deaccelerate the center in any direction (in two dimentions))
makes any sense ?
Øystein
: I have just had an interesting thought on the nature of gravity, what if gravitation were a purely lenz force based phenomena.
: Lets take a look at Hal Puthoff's theory of inertia, he suggests that both quantitativly and qualitativly interia is a lenz force which acts on any particle of matter that moves relative to the static Zero point field, in other words it is what the victorians might have called 'aetheric drag'. Now what can be deduced from this about the nature of gravitation?, according to General relativity, gravitation and inertia are the same phenomena the only difference is one of reference frame, puthoff's ideas on inertia would seem to agree with this if you make the logical asumption that static gravitational force is the product of a static (non linear accelerating) body being acted upon from all angles by a moving zero point field! Not only would this be evidence for an energetic gravitational field, but it is also evidence for a form of push gravity, La Sageian in nature!
: Here is an experiment I would like anyone with access to a high voltage (30,000KV+) power supply to perform. Create an asymetric capacitor, like a lifter, place it anode DOWN and cathode UP (opposite to flight configuration)on an insulated surface and suspend a di-electric mass above the cathode observe any changes in weight, and repeat at different heights above the cathode and with different di-electrics, another thing to do would be to shield the capacitor in some way to prevent any measurements from being interfeared with by ion wind/migration. The reason for this experiment is simple, if the Biefeld-Brown electro kinetic/gravitic effect is the product of an inertial force, electricaly generated and acting on the capacitor as opposed to some kind of ion wind/migration related effect (yet to be ruled out 100%)then according to Puthoff/relativity the asymetric electric gradient produced by the capacitor is interacting with and accelerating the local Zero point field through it, imparting a greater moment of inertia to the capacitor which would account for it's weight loss and levitation. If the capacitor is inverted then the flow of zero point field should be towards the ground, this should mean that the capaci