Re: Weight dimensions


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]

Posted by MrTim (152.163.188.198) on December 12, 2002 at 22:04:45:

In Reply to: Re: Weight dimensions posted by John Collins on December 11, 2002 at 23:53:40:

to John C (and everybody)

>That 40 lb figure I threw out there was just as an example (I was going to say 50... :) 40 lbs = 100 cubic inches, or 5"x5"x4", 10"x5"x2", etc. (or whatever shape you use)

>That's a lot of weight in a small space!

>Anyways, I stand by the 'modular' theory. (Easier to install/remove, which also helps when balancing the wheel (Something very important in my opinion, and also quite overlooked.)) Especially when you get to those really BIG wheels.

>cheers!

>MrTim

: Just a quick point. Don't forget that the 40 lbs per weight was an early estimation of mine and the true weight could be much less.

: John C:

: Hello everyone!

: : A 4 pound weight (assuming it's made of lead*) only measures 2.5" diameter x 2" thick (3.92 lbs. actually) If a hole is cast or drilled through the center, it would allow weights to be 'stacked' on a rod. Also, being in a modular form allows for easier handling. (I've stockpiled over a 100 lbs of lead. Even in 2 lb chunks it's a bear to move small amounts. Imagine trying to install a single 40 lb weight in a wheel and you'll see why a modular installation makes better sense...)

: :

: : MrTim

: : * Lead makes sense because it's heavier, and easier to work with, than iron. Lead is HAZARDOUS, so take proper precautions if you are going to use it. And by hazardous I don't mean dropping it on your foot....





Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Comments:
(Archived Message)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]