Bessler facts, not assumptions


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]

Posted by John Collins (194.164.38.144) on February 06, 2003 at 00:07:40:

David - my point in mentioning my book was part of my correction of your assumption that Bessler's wheel did not alter speed under load, and not, as you implied, to advertise my book - it isn't currently available. These and other facts were decribed in great detail in the book and I feel as if we are going over old ground unnecessarily. Having said that I don't mind going over it again with people who are open-minded enough to consider the facts in an unbiased way. It seems to me that you are trying to prove that Bessler could not have been genuine, but you don't need to do that, everything we are taught is designed to help us come to that conclusion.

People who visit this site and return repeated usually do so out of interest and because the subject fascinates them. They want to know why we think Bessler was not a fake and I, along with many others, am happy to discuss our reasons. But you seem to determined to prove that what we have mostly accepted is wrong - despite the fact that you are arguing from a position weaked by not knowing all the facts. We know the arguments against Bessler's validity are strong, but we also know that the facts concerning the wheels do not support physics as it is currently taught. You may say that the facts as described must be wrong. I say go away and find out, as I did, and then come to a conclusion based on the evidence and not on your preconceptions.

John C.





Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Comments:
(Archived Message)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]