Posted by John Collins (194.164.38.125) on July 01, 2003 at 14:55:43:
In Reply to: John C./Park posted by Michael on July 01, 2003 at 14:38:06:
Hi Michael,
Perhaps it was misleading, I don't know? I meant only that there is a place for everyone's view of Bessler's work and even though I agree with you and in fact tried, successfully, to get Parks to remove the theological aspect from his work, I still think that if one person's interpretation of Bessler's published works leads to a successful device then it must be worthwhile. Having said that I must admit that my own view of Park's work was that it was far too subjective and full of assumptions.
So my advice is to read Park's words, look for inspiration, but treat it as fiction.
JC
: John, how can you say Parks "interpretation" has a role to play in Besslers work? Stating it that way can be very misleading. It's just an interpretation nothing more, and as for Grim, Park has intermixed his ideas in with everything thst is actually factual from Bessler throughout all of his pages, which in my opinion makes a lot of it garbage. Parks even admitted at the end of his paper he did this.