Re: Grim question

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]

Posted by MrTim (205.188.208.9) on August 11, 2003 at 16:28:19:

In Reply to: Re: Grim question posted by grim on August 11, 2003 at 13:01:05:

: Just went to a site, FYI, that stated it was against US Federal law to construct a "perpetual motion machine" that would prove detrimental to
: the petroleum industry and utilities. Before I take that at face value, will search US Code.
: Thank goodness there's "no such thing", huh?
: Regards
: grim

Maybe not Federal (yet), but look what California tried to do. (Fortunately they were stopped. For now...) Isn't that rich? To paraphrase: "You have to pay your fair share because by opting out of the power grid, others will have to pay more."

http://www.matr.net/print-5850.html

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Comments:	: : Just went to a site, FYI, that stated it was against US Federal law to construct a "perpetual motion machine" that would prove detrimental to : : the petroleum industry and utilities. Before I take that at face value, will search US Code. : : Thank goodness there's "no such thing", huh? : : Regards : : grim : Maybe not Federal (yet), but look what California tried to do. (Fortunately they were stopped. For now...) Isn't that rich? To paraphrase: "You have to pay your fair share because by opting out of the power grid, others will have to pay more."
Optional Link URL:
(Archived Message)