Posted by Lurker (69.11.194.4) on September 07, 2003 at 18:11:05:
In Reply to: Re: Changing the name posted by Huh? on September 07, 2003 at 16:37:41:
: I take this information to mean that your understanding leads you to believe that the wheel would run laying on it's side with the axle pointing skyward? Now that would be quite a machine!
He has stated in the past that centrifugal force can be substituted for gravity. Thus, gravity is not needed. He has ALSO stated that the centrifugal force versions would be FAR more powerful than the gravity driven versions. This reminds me of the machines created by Felix Wurth. I believe he is another German who has created overunity devices which create energy from centrifugal force instead of gravity.
For that matter, I also believe that shauberger's devices used centrifugal force as their source of energy, NOT "implosion" as is commonly believed. There are several other devices that could be similerly be named in regard to centrifugal force.
However, I am NOT convinced that resonance is the ONLY way to extract the gravitational and centrifugal forces as sources of energy. Sorry to contradict you, George. I believe you may have a PART of the answer, but not the WHOLE answer.
Lurker.