Re: A Response to 'Lurker'


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]

Posted by Pete (81.131.134.155) on September 13, 2003 at 04:31:50:

In Reply to: Re: A Response to 'Lurker' posted by Lurker on September 12, 2003 at 23:54:30:

I agree with Mr Tim, go play somewhere else please.

Pete.

: : If you don't believe in the wheel (for whatever reason), then
: : fine. Your opinion has been noted. It's okay to be skeptical,
: : despairing even, but don't try to change OUR minds. It's been
: : tried before (go read through the archives) but it hasn't
: : stopped any of us.
: : And it won't.
: : If anything, YOUR antics are counter-productive, especially to
: : those who approach the Bessler phenomena with an open mind.

: I was being sarcastic, MrTim, in case you did not recognize that fact. I don't really think that people who believe Bessler was genuine are crackpots. I was merely using sarcasm to point out the fact that a near majority of the world's population sees it that way.

: : Whenever the words "aliens", "conspiracy", "men in black"
: : (or whatever!) enter in the context of a discussion, they tune
: : out, no matter what the merits of the case. Who's going to take
: : something seriously after that?

: : ****You do ALL of the people on this board a disservice by
: : bringing up this garbage.****

: You forget that the same is true with perpetual motion. From the perspective of the rest of the world, everyone on this board is a crack-pot because they take Bessler seriously. In fact, more people believe in aliens, conspiracies, and MIBS than do perpetual motion.

: : Mainstream science would open it's mind a little more if it
: : wasn't for the 'taint' that people (like you) give to obscure
: : (and deserving of research) subjects.

: Anything having to do with perpetual motion and free-energy devices is ALREADY tainted in the eyes of mainstream science. Therfore, your point is not valid.

: : Apparently you want attention too, which is why you are being
: : so inflammatory.

: I most certainly have no desire for any attention from you, MrTim, nor am I being "inflamatory". I am merely pointing out certain things which I feel are important. If you disagree, that is your perogative, but you have no good reason to childishly flame me simply because you don't like what I have to say.

:
: Lurker.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Comments:
Optional Link URL:
(Archived Message)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]