Posted by Michael (199.60.107.1) on September 24, 2003 at 17:14:47:
Personally I don't either, but this isn't mine, I actually pulled the title and content from a different site. Anyone here agree with any of these points?
Why I Don't Believe In a Free Energy Suppression Conspiracy
ADVERTISEMENT
click here
Several reasons, actually. Here they are:
* You can't suppress science. We tried with nuclear
weapons, but that was doomed to fail because the Nazis
and Russians were already working on the same thing.
It would be the same with "free energy" research: If
it was real, some scientist somewhere in the world
would find it and another scientist, somewhere else,
would verify it. There are too many people looking for
this, in all parts of the world, where there is no
policitcal apparatus tied in with "big oil" or the
other usual suspects.
In other words, if free energy was out there, somebody
would already have found it and others would have
confirmed it. It could never be suppressed everywhere
for all time.
Ambiguous, contradictory results wouldn't be an issue,
either (ie, cold fusion). People would be building
free energy exploiting machines on assembly lines if
they physically could.
* Governments aren't any good at keeping Big Lies
secret. Nuclear weapons, mass murders, you name it and
if its big enough it will leak. Free energy would be
WAY big enough to give a lot of the thousands of
individuals who must be "in the know" to squeal, at
least somewhere in the world. So far all we've ever
heard of is unverified allegations of saucers floating
in hangars and that stuff. If it was real the actual
plans, equations and theories ON THE VARIOUS AGENCIES'
LETTERHEAD would have come out long ago. Not
allegations, but math and physics. And not just in
dribs and drabs, but entire volumes of material,
enough for anyone to exploit.
* Conventioal science that disallows "free energy" at
all but the most trivial levels (e.g. Casimir effect
exploits) works very well. If it didn't we would not
have nuclear reactors, solid state electronics (or ANY
electronics, for that matter, including vacuum tubes).
All the models mesh very well and none of them allow
for free energy. Ditto, of course, advanced physics
with the trivial exceptions noted above.
In other words, theories that we know work well
disallow free energy, so that means free energy is not
allowed. Naturally, that means no suppression
conspiracy is needed.
* Businesses supposedly part of the conspiracy really
do spend money on improving energy efficiency. Auto
makers do, as do engineers. If they were part of the
conspiracy (and didn't the auto makers bury some of
the miracle carburetors?), why bother? Would the
stockholders stand for them wasting millions of
dollars each year pretending to be doing research? I
sincerely doubt that.
Incentives to improve fuel economy and efficiency do
exist, too. Various taxes are paid as penalties for
excess energy consumption and any manufacturer would
get a huge competitive jump if they could exploit a
free energy technology. But so far, nothing.
- Gary