Posted by Georg Künstler (217.2.165.42) on October 05, 2003 at 08:45:28:
In Reply to: Question for John,Scott, and Oyvvus posted by Michael on October 03, 2003 at 11:49:12:
: Hi.
: If the general thought is Bessler included pendulums as speed modifiers only, then wouldn't it be wise to mention this in the areas mentioned on the respective boards? I am saying this because too many people look at the information posted up and come away with the wrong idea.
: Also a question to all. Has anyone thought of doing a measurement on Bessler himself? If Bessler was as paranoid as stated (enough to drive him half mad to make him very unsociable) then doesn't it only stand to reason he would take EVERY percaution NOT to reveil anything? Doesn't it also,then, also stand to reason that everything he did produce (except for the papers he hid or buried) was meant to lead one away from what the real means of his machine were? This would include TM of course and all writtings (except of course eyewitness testimony.) For anyone questioning the idea that he may want something as proof if he didn't have a wheel up and running at a certain point, he did know where he buried his own papers.
: Best regards,
: Mike
Hello Mike,
I think the pendulums hanging outside, in the middle of the picture were
not necessary. But this is also discribed in his book.
What Bessler did was always the opposite of normal thinking.
As you see of the pendulum, the pendulum has no fixed axle.
The axle is moveable, so that the pendulum is not only able to work as a pendulum, no,
it ist also able to do HITS. Have a closer look to the pendulums please, and you will
see that.
But all other discriptions are definetely correct.
The main sentence for me was: GAIN ITS ENERGY FROM ITS OWN SWINGING.
Again we are on an oscillating system with hits(trouble force).
Best regards
Georg