A perpetual motion allegory...

[iacob alex]

.....as a delusion , at : www.lettl.de/pics/g191.jpg
but as a hope , also...at : https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-tvaKg3X4TE
Al_ex

[AB Hammer]

Al_ex

interesting video and music for an inspiration. I have 3 weeks and a day and my operations that I have to go through start. This means no armor construction for a while. But with help from my sons. I may be able to do some wheel work and I will finish my next videos to post. The second part to this one and some new designs.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ny7O7bAn2uU

[iacob alex]

Hi AB !
Firstly , I wish you a good health and success for the next video.
Personally , I am interested for your development of :
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5I4NDGcj1UA
Al_ex

[AB Hammer]

Hi Al_ex

I had just picked up the rest of the steel I needed for the new stand so I can finish that one. I am making it so it can be dissembled to be moved. Otherwise it would be to bulky. It is going to be a wild machine for testing in full setup.


Alan

[iacob alex]

Hi AB !
My suggestion for your test-stand : as a starting experiment , you can try the most simple arrangement of variable / oscillatory leverage , at :
www.geocities.ws/iacob_alex/Some_Drafts/text032.jpg
Open to view , it's a pair of levers operated by a possible continuous gravity unbalance...on the same side of the fulcrum...if we take into consideration the continuous moving support under the beams , and the corespondent variability of reactions on a first degree lever.
Al_ex

[AB Hammer]

Al_ex

Already did that test but with the weights at the end of each arm and when they both where full length before I cut one down, no runner but easy spin. I also did other variation test. Now it is time for the new stand so other test can be done.

Alan

[iacob alex]

Hi AB !
As I see at : https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=A5pPaTqd-4w you play two inverted pendulums...not two simple supported beams.
Al_ex

[AB Hammer]

Al_ex

Look at this photo and you will see I didn't start out with the mounts I added later that shows on the video.

http://www.besslerwheel.com/forum/downl ... er=user_id

The fact of what I am doing is replacing those I added with the new device of inversion. Then we will see how it rocks. ;-)

Alan

[iacob alex]

Hi AB !
The essence of this test is to play the variance of two heavy simple supported beams ( Class 2,3 levers) on a "weighting device" (Class 1 lever) , that is brought into a possible continuous non-equilibrium .
Take a simply supported beam in a fixed point and try to "feel" in your hands your effort in different points...or a variable leverage.
With two simply supported beams you can make a "comparison" and use it as a torque difference on a common lever.
The problem is to put "at work" this torque difference /gravity unbalance...
Al_ex

[AB Hammer]

Hi Al_ex

What happens is at one point it is heavier than the other and what you gain is countered by distance which will equal it out again. Thus the reason of change in my direction of approach.

Alan

[iacob alex]

Hi AB !
Some people call this type of variable leverage as an "unbalanced weights scale " , you can see at :
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qsoUemkAm ... e=youtu.be
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VuMkLBtUf ... e=youtu.be
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_gAchuS8SyU
The general idea is the same ( unbalance on a scale/lever) , but the problem is to obtain "self" motion ( due to a continuous gravity unbalance on the same side of the fulcrum ).
Really , an idea can be the root of creation...but , maybe it "grows" better when transmitted to another person...
Al_ex