Grease power

[preoccupied]

The the god of the storm symbol wheel
I made the lever lengths 4 for the calculations.
Diagram 1
8+4-1.5+4-1.5+4+4=21 left side
+.31+4+4+8+4.31+5.5=26.21 right side
lifting the orange lever
1.5*3=4.5 is a single lever lifting lifting a single orange weight, it would be 3 weight orange ball going 1.5 distdance. there are 6 levers lifting the weight and 2 balls being lifted horizontally. so 3*4.5=13.5 is the weight of the ORANGE BALL in this diagram. The orange ball moves back and forth 1.5 distance and is 13.5 weight. Which means it provides overbalance of 20.25 when turned over on its side.
Diagram 2
8+4+4+4+4=24 left side
0.31+4-1.5+4.31+8-1.5+4+4.31=21.93 right side
The right side if negative by 2.07 in the end of the spin before the orange weight is taken into consideration and it would add 20.25 to get 18.18 overbalance.

[preoccupied]

The swastika is four right angles but if you build branches to it it's more effective at becoming overbalanced than if you made the swastika with four right angles larger. This must be a good sign. Well the swastika was a sign for the nazi's but that's not what I meant. It's like a good omen. A good luck. A good idea. What the hell am I talking about? If this is Bessler's wheel I am not the original inventor Bessler is but I am good enough. I want a permanent patent on this for demonstration purposes and I want the wheel to never be used to produce physical work and destroy Earth's gravity.

[preoccupied]

If you add more branches you will create more space for more weights per radius increase. If you just increase the radius on a 4 right angle swastika and double it you will have room for less weights in the 3d space. In a 4 right angle swastika you would have to pack all of the weight on four positions. You have several positions to stack the weights on with more branches. Also the distances from the axle are worse with more branches but you can physically fit more weights in the mechanism. The reals question is is it really overbalanced? If it's overbalanced then adding more weights or more branches would make it a stronger wheel. Then the schematics to fit more weight in would be relevant to create more power in economical amount of space.

I measured the distance between the levers at distance of lever 4 and they leave just enough to be about 3:1 ratio with the small gear pushing up the orange weight. So the orange weight is pushed up 1.5 distance times the number of driving weights. So with one four sided right angles it will give 3 distance power. That is overbalanced! The wheel isn't negatively unbalanced by that much at any point in the turn. The levers shift 22.5 degrees.

[preoccupied]

This is my hammer design that I made a few months after I joined the forum but I had really bad math then. The website even messed up how the thread was viewed somehow like a distraction to how bad my math was. Like as I were in trouble or something for being so stupid. I had something like this then. I think that I had this specifically conjoined together in pictures then on my computer. It was hard to remember. I was looking at Mryy stuff and i was like this reminds me of something! It will have about 1 negative force and the impact hits in a position of total distance of 4 from the axle in this position drawn.

[preoccupied]

It has been a while since I've drawn this. I had to correct the left diagram. I bet it makes a lot more sense now.

[preoccupied]

Man i feel like cussing loudly. I fixed it okay. This is what the drawing is supposed to look like. I thought I had it correct the first time but I had to correct it twice. This is a compounded version of mt18 with a lever adding distance to it. I think all of Bessler's clues of some kind of creative outcome like this THAT WORKS. I think this would be a runner. One of Bessler's many wheels.

[preoccupied]

My brain is failing me. I made so mistakes trying to draw this in MS Paint. I looked at it four time and I swore I got it right. Can't touch this effort from my failing brain. Hammer time. I think that I got it right this time.

Hammer - U can't touch this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otCpCn0l4Wo

There is 4 distance on the weights when they impact and two on the negative side. The wheel only has about 0.5 weight on the impact side before the weights swing hard to hit. It might not work. But if you calculate with a 45 degree turn in place a second diagram added to it 45 degrees more into the turn, the you have a 4 distance impact that already happened at 45 degrees and it's 4.5ish before the springs release the weights. It's it's going to be 3 on the negative side then. So sitting with 8 sections of levers and springs, it's 4.5ish on the falling side and 3 on the negative side and then it's 8 after the second impact. So like 8 vs 3.

You have to look at the possibility of adding a second cross at 45 degrees and adding it to the wheel because the weights release on a horizontal position. That extension isn't in place before the springs release unless there is a 45 degree turned position added to the wheel like this wheel does that, it adds great distance to the lever.

This excellent. Another great idea by me. I am proud to share it. It just took a few tries to draw. I am literally factually blind to coordinated thought. I am incomplete. I have brain limitations. I am not the bright guy that I used to be. But did I discover a Bessler wheel? EH? I think that I did. It is definitely a lot like MT18. This has got to be a hint that all MT drawings lead to a perpetual motion machine. or gravity wheel. I know there was some discussion saying that gravity makes it not a real perpetual motion machine. I think that's correct. It's a difficult thing to do but gravity is a source of energy.

[preoccupied]

In my overkill drawings I explained that a 90 degree turn on a wheel, for a lever on the rim of the wheel that starts straight, it can become perpendicular to the lever naturally if it goes with the full 90 degree turn of the wheel. This is one of Bessler's rules for perpetual motion, one of the obvious tricks I think. You can make a lever any distance using this method and lever up a weight and it works just fine in mt13. MT 13 can use the 90 degree turn of the wheel to make a lever that reloads the weight turn 90 degrees also. Now I do say I don't know right now how long the lever has to be. But it can be any length or infinite length. That's the point. Whatever the rules are for gears that govern this, eventually it will be long enough if you make it the right length. I didn't draw this compensating for the idea but I think that you first have to make the lever longer than the radius of the wheel and then additional length goes towards lifting the weight. If this is true my lever that goes onto the 45 degree ramp onto the side of the drawing has to be twice as long of a lever. There is a 1:1 pushing the weight upright because the lever goes 90 degrees so can the gear.

[preoccupied]

My overkill overbalanced wheel method is better represented with this image and not the last drawing for mt13... See I had difficulty visualizing what I was drawing in my last ms painting. I think that I purchased for a billion dollars or five billion for information about Bessler when I was a kid and then donated part of it for research. I had a few billion to spare, I was a super super rich kid but I wasn't sharing money with my parents. I don't know if they were original documents or copies. There were no translations then. I had a bank then and was inventing medicine in kindergarten. I don't have anything and I don't have access to my bank right now. My mother then Candice stole my shit like unpublished medical research, collectibles like documents, and gold and shit when she adopted me to her sister. The path here that the lever goes through is 90 degrees and it has infinite possible length. At some length possibly a lot it will load the weight upwards with ease. I probably should have just shared my money straight up with my parents so that people would have stopped hurting me and stealing my shit.

[preoccupied]

This is a distance doubling device that is based on a song that I think that I sang and made for the main stream media which is something that I did, I made album music used by celebrities. The song I think came from the documents that I bought about Bessler that I mentioned when I had my bank when I was in kindergarten, he had diary and some songs. Anyways I can't reveal the song because that would compromise me as the artist of a celebrities music. I don't know if I'm right. I am basing this design based on a song that I think that I created for a celebrity. Seriously? I am looking for clues in some popular song! That I think that I made? Do you believe me? If this works it might be half of the device that I used to destroy planets and destroy an alien that kept killing all life on Earth over and over again. I killed that giant alien good. I am a hero time traveler. My duplicates in space have a device that can destroy planets, at any time they could come back and get aggravated and destroy the city or a planet out our planet. But I'm not a terrorist, my duplicates are Yahweh or whatever they want to call themselves. Yahweh was a name that called myself when I killed the giant space alien in outer space. I also called myself Vegeta and Goku. I am sort of into DBZ. Again I don't know if I'm right about anything that I'm saying because I am basing this device that I have drawn on a song. I song that I can listen to on YouTube. Isn't that crazy? I am looking for clues in a song and I don't know if it was actually one of Bessler's songs but it is a song that I made, I believe so. I think it was part of a song from Bessler though at least part of the song might be, might be something that i pulled from Bessler diary that I had when I had my bank. I can't prove that I ever had a diary from Bessler or other documents and I am kind of without any credibility because I can't contact my bank and I am poor right now. I hit my head a lot. Give me a fucking break for believing something crazy like this. I don't know what is real. I believe this shit though that I'm saying. I'm sorry. I shouldn't post this. I don't know what I'm talking about, about the diary existing. But this is my idea now. It might be half of the device that can destroy a planet. It's similar to the Egyptian engineer Yahweh x shaped device that can create and destroy matter.

[preoccupied]

This is an example of how the previous image can compound. The previous image should have been balanced but what you should have saw is that it had extra distance distributed if it did move. So this is what it looks like if you change it up so that that extra distance does something. It trades into the next device the distance allowing twice as long of a green lever for 2x the power then it takes that power into the next device adding larger gears and has 4x distance and 2x power and then it doubles the lever again for 4x distance 4x power. so it's balanced as drawn but if it did move it would be 1 weight moving 4 weights 4x the distance. I mean you might as well use one less weight on the load it would be over balanced. This is not a time machine but it is powerful. OR DID I MISS SOMETHING? I am not always right! I remember trying to draw this a long time ago on the forum but nobody produced this from what I was describing and trying to draw... that was a long time ago. So the song just rekindled my thinking from before. Maybe the song was irrelevant.

EDIT
well it was a fair attempt by me but I made a mistake. I did the right thing to try to do but it doesn't double every time. It does increase though. I can increase the lever by the radius of the gear not double it. And then it can go from there in the same way in that proportion (I think).

[preoccupied]

I'd like to share this new drawing. The top side lifts up. In this picture of the concept it has a 2:1 gear pulley. So the top side lifts up 45 degrees. There is a spring about half strength pushing the weight to the topside position. So after the weight is lifted 45 degrees it will eventually move the remainder 90 degrees because of the spring. The wheel should turn continuously and at break neck speed. Driven slightly faster than gravity falls by the springs assistance until the speed of the wheel is driving faster than the spring.

Sincerely,
Jon Perry

[preoccupied]

The concept that made my drawing work was that the spring would pull up the weight after it reaches a 45 degree position by the pulley and lever. This would work only if the spring is only applying to the top side turning the lever CCW. So in order to that that in hindsight I see that the spring needs to be wound by the overbalance of the whole wheel and not share the same spring with the driving weight on the pulley like i had suggested.

The weight on the top side becomes weightless because of the spring as it nears the 45 degree position because the spring is pulling it CCW, so the pulley lever that is completely fallen vertical does in fact lift it to the 45 degree position because of the weights weightlessness. So how this really works is just before the weights begin to shift the spring is contracted by a track that it touches at the wheel turns. The overbalance of the whole wheel contracts the spring just before the spring is used. The combination of the pulley and the spring shifts the weights into overbalanced positions in which ample amounts of torque is available by the whole wheel to reload the spring and the wheel remains plenty overbalanced. How overbalanced does it remain? Well it's continuously overbalanced by about 2 distance points. The spring requires about half a distance point of power to reload so it's overbalanced by about 1.5 distance points continuously. The spring does require its use to put the weights into their over balanced positions so as the wheel turns faster than the spring can do this, the wheel will slow down; it won't spin out of control because of this.

EDIT

In my MS Painting I put the track before the weights begin to shift. I think what would be technically correct is putting the track after the weights shift and then holding the spring and releasing it on the top side when the weight shift. I'm sure somebody would have suggested that if I had a collaborator on the idea. I'm alone right now but if you can tell this is a good idea let me know.

[preoccupied]

The pulley is offset so it only applies force to one side of the wheel. What do you think about that? The swastika might or might not be relevant. I am hoping that it might be relevant and assist but the pulley itself is what is offset. Did I do it wrong? I think I did it right. Congratulations might be in order. Please bring on the attention. This is obviously a runner if I thought of it correctly. Where is my mistake? Did I make a mistake?

Now that I think about it what if I did do it wrong? What if it's always in the center no matter what? If that's the case then if the weight is heavy enough it will bend the swastika arm and bring it out of balance. So there it works no matter what because it works if it's center or not because of the swastika. If the swastika arm bends it will move more to one side.

[preoccupied]

This is my favorite design yet. The swastika arm bends releasing string and the weight should swing to one side because of the lack of string on the top right will pull it to the right when its suspended.