Re: Nick Hall

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]

Posted by Hiinton (68.147.4.183) on May 15, 2003 at 15:28:54:

In Reply to: Re: Nick Hall posted by Nick Hall on May 14, 2003 at 12:55:08:

Nick you wrote,

I DO believe that Bessler (and others) succeeded in making a rotary device capable of continuous energy input from gravity such that it not only 'kept going' but provided additional useful output energy.

But also admit your knowing gravity is conservative. Point is any gravity engine IS a perpetual motion machine. To also prove... you don't even need gravity to run, just a very large rotating torus in space would work the same.

Who are the others you mention, and where are they now?

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Comments:	: Nick you wrote, : I DO believe that Bessler (and others) succeeded in making a rotary device capable of continuous energy input from gravity such that it not only 'kept going' but provided additional useful output energy. : But also admit your knowing gravity is conservative. Point is any gravity engine IS a perpetual motion machine. To also prove... you don't even need gravity to run, just a very large rotating torus in space would work the same. : Who are the others you mention, and where are they now?
(Archived Message)