Posted by Lurker (69.11.193.71) on September 09, 2003 at 17:34:28:
In Reply to: to Lurker posted by Georg Künstler on September 09, 2003 at 14:23:27:
: Hi Lurker,
: I don't have the same opinion as you have. You are saying that
: centrifugal devices have a bright future. My opinion is, that
: this kind of devices are only a middle step. The final step, is
: the electronic step, think of Tesla, or the Testatika.
: I made my developements backwards, from testatika to centrifugal devices, to Bessler.
: And all,all with the same principle.
: Best regards
: Georg
:
Certainly, sources of free electrical energy will be important in the future. For example, imagine every light bulb has its own free elecrical energy supply. All computers, all radios, and every other electrical device will have its own perpetual elecrical energy supply.
However, for MECAHANICAL energy, centrifugal motors will be far better than electrical motors. Consider transportation, for example. Automobiles will do better with centrifugal motors than they would with expensive electrical motors driven by a free energy electrical supply.
Also, consider inertial drives which can propel space vehicles, air vehicles, without the need for propellant. My favorite is the TIE drive, though the Cook drive might also work. These are mechanical devices, and they require a source of mechanical energy. A centrifugal motor would be best for this.
There is evidence that inertial drives and centrifugal motors have been used secretly since the time of World War II, by the way.
Lurker.