Re: Why I Don't Believe In a Free Energy Suppression Conspiracy


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]

Posted by ovyyus (150.101.145.242) on September 24, 2003 at 17:52:42:

In Reply to: Why I Don't Believe In a Free Energy Suppression Conspiracy posted by Michael on September 24, 2003 at 17:14:47:

Hi Michael,

IMO, you can't suppress what you don't yet have.

Of course, some believe that we don't have it yet because it's been suppressed. IMO, there's no evidence to support this belief. Of course, a belief does not necessarily require evidence, does it :)

Regards, ovyyus


: Personally I don't either, but this isn't mine, I actually pulled the title and content from a different site. Anyone here agree with any of these points?

:
: Why I Don't Believe In a Free Energy Suppression Conspiracy

: ADVERTISEMENT
: click here
: Several reasons, actually. Here they are:

: * You can't suppress science. We tried with nuclear
: weapons, but that was doomed to fail because the Nazis
: and Russians were already working on the same thing.
: It would be the same with "free energy" research: If
: it was real, some scientist somewhere in the world
: would find it and another scientist, somewhere else,
: would verify it. There are too many people looking for
: this, in all parts of the world, where there is no
: policitcal apparatus tied in with "big oil" or the
: other usual suspects.

: In other words, if free energy was out there, somebody
: would already have found it and others would have
: confirmed it. It could never be suppressed everywhere
: for all time.

: Ambiguous, contradictory results wouldn't be an issue,
: either (ie, cold fusion). People would be building
: free energy exploiting machines on assembly lines if
: they physically could.

: * Governments aren't any good at keeping Big Lies
: secret. Nuclear weapons, mass murders, you name it and
: if its big enough it will leak. Free energy would be
: WAY big enough to give a lot of the thousands of
: individuals who must be "in the know" to squeal, at
: least somewhere in the world. So far all we've ever
: heard of is unverified allegations of saucers floating
: in hangars and that stuff. If it was real the actual
: plans, equations and theories ON THE VARIOUS AGENCIES'
: LETTERHEAD would have come out long ago. Not
: allegations, but math and physics. And not just in
: dribs and drabs, but entire volumes of material,
: enough for anyone to exploit.

: * Conventioal science that disallows "free energy" at
: all but the most trivial levels (e.g. Casimir effect
: exploits) works very well. If it didn't we would not
: have nuclear reactors, solid state electronics (or ANY
: electronics, for that matter, including vacuum tubes).
: All the models mesh very well and none of them allow
: for free energy. Ditto, of course, advanced physics
: with the trivial exceptions noted above.

: In other words, theories that we know work well
: disallow free energy, so that means free energy is not
: allowed. Naturally, that means no suppression
: conspiracy is needed.

: * Businesses supposedly part of the conspiracy really
: do spend money on improving energy efficiency. Auto
: makers do, as do engineers. If they were part of the
: conspiracy (and didn't the auto makers bury some of
: the miracle carburetors?), why bother? Would the
: stockholders stand for them wasting millions of
: dollars each year pretending to be doing research? I
: sincerely doubt that.

: Incentives to improve fuel economy and efficiency do
: exist, too. Various taxes are paid as penalties for
: excess energy consumption and any manufacturer would
: get a huge competitive jump if they could exploit a
: free energy technology. But so far, nothing.

: - Gary




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:
Subject:
Comments:
Optional Link URL:
(Archived Message)


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Bessler Discussion Board ] [ FAQ ] [ Back to BesslerWheel.com ]